Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Jieun Lee"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review
Clinical practice recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with solid cancer: a joint report from KSMO and KSP
Miso Kim, Hyo Sup Shim, Sheehyun Kim, In Hee Lee, Jihun Kim, Shinkyo Yoon, Hyung-Don Kim, Inkeun Park, Jae Ho Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Jaekyung Cheon, In-Ho Kim, Jieun Lee, Sook Hee Hong, Sehhoon Park, Hyun Ae Jung, Jin Won Kim, Han Jo Kim, Yongjun Cha, Sun Min Lim, Han Sang Kim, Choong-Kun Lee, Jee Hung Kim, Sang Hoon Chun, Jina Yun, So Yeon Park, Hye Seung Lee, Yong Mee Cho, Soo Jeong Nam, Kiyong Na, Sun Och Yoon, Ahwon Lee, Kee-Taek Jang, Hongseok Yun, Sungyoung Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Wan-Seop Kim
Received September 15, 2023  Accepted November 1, 2023  Published online January 10, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2023.11.01    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 873 View
  • 137 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.
Original Article
Analysis of the molecular subtypes of preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimens in invasive breast cancer
Ye Sul Jeong, Jun Kang, Jieun Lee, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Sung Hun Kim, Ahwon Lee
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(1):87-94.   Published online November 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.10.14
  • 6,105 View
  • 194 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Accurate molecular classification of breast core needle biopsy (CNB) tissue is important for determining neoadjuvant systemic therapies for invasive breast cancer. The researchers aimed to evaluate the concordance rate (CR) of molecular subtypes between CNBs and surgical specimens.
Methods
This study was conducted with invasive breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after CNB at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital between December 2014 and December 2017. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. ER and PR were evaluated by Allred score (0–8). HER2 was graded from 0 to +3, and all 2+ cases were reflex tested with silver in situ hybridization. The labeling index of Ki67 was counted by either manual scoring or digital image analysis. Molecular subtypes were classified using the above surrogate markers.
Results
In total, 629 patients were evaluated. The CRs of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 were 96.5% (kappa, 0.883; p<.001), 93.0% (kappa, 0.824; p<.001), 99.7% (kappa, 0.988; p<.001), and 78.7% (kappa, 0.577; p<.001), respectively. Digital image analysis of Ki67 in CNB showed better concordance with Ki67 in surgical specimens (CR, 82.3%; kappa, 0.639 for digital image analysis vs. CR, 76.2%; kappa, 0.534 for manual counting). The CRs of luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and triple negative types were 89.0%, 70.0%, 82.9%, and 77.2%, respectively.
Conclusions
CNB was reasonably accurate for determining ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, and molecular subtypes. Using digital image analysis for Ki67 in CNB produced more accurate molecular classifications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Concordance of immunohistochemistry for predictive and prognostic factors in breast cancer between biopsy and surgical excision: a single-centre experience and review of the literature
    Chiara Rossi, Sara Fraticelli, Marianna Fanizza, Alberta Ferrari, Elisa Ferraris, Alessia Messina, Angelica Della Valle, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina Anghelone, Angioletta Lasagna, Gianpiero Rizzo, Lorenzo Perrone, Maria Grazia Sommaruga, Giulia Meloni, S
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 198(3): 573.     CrossRef
  • Single-center study on clinicopathological and typical molecular pathologic features of metastatic brain tumor
    Su Hwa Kim, Young Suk Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Yeoun Eun Sung, Ahwon Lee, Jun Kang, Jae-Sung Park, Sin Soo Jeun, Youn Soo Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2023; 57(4): 217.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Based on Maximum-Intensity Projection in Young Patients with Marked Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI
    Ga-Eun Park, Bong-Joo Kang, Sung-hun Kim, Na-Young Jung
    Life.2023; 13(8): 1744.     CrossRef
  • Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision specimens for Ki‐67 in breast cancer – a systematic review of the literature
    Jahnavi Kalvala, Ruth M Parks, Andrew R Green, Kwok‐Leung Cheung
    Histopathology.2022; 80(3): 468.     CrossRef
  • İnvaziv Meme Kanserinde Preoperatif Kor İğne Biyopsi ile Postoperatif Cerrahi Spesmenler Arasında ER, PR, HER2 ve Ki67 Açısından Karşılaştırma
    Pınar CELEPLİ, Pelin Seher ÖZTEKİN, Salih CELEPLİ, İrem BİGAT, Sema HÜCÜMENOĞLU
    Akdeniz Medical Journal.2022; : 179.     CrossRef
  • Concordance of breast cancer biomarker testing in core needle biopsy and surgical specimens: A single institution experience
    Jessica A. Slostad, Nicole K. Yun, Aimee E. Schad, Surbhi Warrior, Louis F. Fogg, Ruta Rao
    Cancer Medicine.2022; 11(24): 4954.     CrossRef
  • N-Cadherin Distinguishes Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from Liver Metastases of Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
    Tiemo S. Gerber, Benjamin Goeppert, Anne Hausen, Hagen R. Witzel, Fabian Bartsch, Mario Schindeldecker, Lisa-Katharina Gröger, Dirk A. Ridder, Oscar Cahyadi, Irene Esposito, Matthias M. Gaida, Peter Schirmacher, Peter R. Galle, Hauke Lang, Wilfried Roth,
    Cancers.2022; 14(13): 3091.     CrossRef
  • Association of Ki-67 Change Pattern After Core Needle Biopsy and Prognosis in HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer Patients
    Shuai Li, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI Features for Prediction Malignant Intra-Mammary Lymph Nodes: Correlations with Mammography and Ultrasound
    Meejung Kim, Bong Joo Kang, Ga Eun Park
    Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2022; 26(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • A single centre experience in Turkey for comparison between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen evaluation results for HER2, SISH, estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in breast cancer patients
    Hatice Karaman, Fatma Senel, Arzu Tasdemir, Ipek Özer, Merve Dogan
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2022; 18(6): 1789.     CrossRef
  • Meme kanseri trucut ve rezeksiyon materyallerinde yeni moleküler sınıflama, tanı ve hormon reseptörlerinin durumu tutarlı mı?
    Yeliz ARMAN KARAKAYA, Sevda YILMAZ, Hande KARABAŞ
    Pamukkale Medical Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What shear wave elastography parameter best differentiates breast cancer and predicts its histologic aggressiveness?
    Hyunjin Kim, Jeongmin Lee, Bong Joo Kang, Sung Hun Kim
    Ultrasonography.2021; 40(2): 265.     CrossRef
  • Risk-based decision-making in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer: Recommendations based on the current state of knowledge
    Christian Jackisch, Patricia Cortazar, Charles E. Geyer, Luca Gianni, Joseph Gligorov, Zuzana Machackova, Edith A. Perez, Andreas Schneeweiss, Sara M. Tolaney, Michael Untch, Andrew Wardley, Martine Piccart
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2021; 99: 102229.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing agreement of breast cancer luminal molecular subtype by Ki67 labeling index between core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens
    Kristina A. Tendl-Schulz, Fabian Rössler, Philipp Wimmer, Ulrike M. Heber, Martina Mittlböck, Nicolas Kozakowski, Katja Pinker, Rupert Bartsch, Peter Dubsky, Florian Fitzal, Martin Filipits, Fanny Carolina Eckel, Eva-Maria Langthaler, Günther Steger, Mich
    Virchows Archiv.2020; 477(4): 545.     CrossRef
Case Study
Erdheim-Chester Disease Involving Lymph Nodes and Liver Clinically Mimicking Lymphoma: A Case Report
Yeoun Eun Sung, Yoon Seo Lee, Jieun Lee, Kyo Young Lee
J Pathol Transl Med. 2018;52(3):183-190.   Published online December 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2017.10.16
  • 6,568 View
  • 216 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis and multisystem disease. First described in 1930, there are no more than 750 cases reported. The etiology remains unknown, but a majority of cases of ECD and Langerhans cell histiocytosis were found to have clonal mutations involving genes of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. We recently encountered a 53-year-old male patient with extensive ECD involving the systemic lymph nodes, pleura, liver, and long bones clinically mimicking malignant lymphoma. Biopsies were performed at multiple sites, including a pleural mass, an external iliac lymph node, bone marrow, and the liver. Based on histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of positivity for CD68 and negativity for CD1a and S-100, the patient was diagnosed with ECD. Interferon-α was administered as the first-line treatment, but the patient rapidly progressed to hepatic failure after 2 months of treatment. We report this rare case of ECD clinically mimicking malignant lymphoma and diagnosed by careful pathological review.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Erdheim Chester Disease Mimicking Lymphoma: A Case Report
    Philipp Moritz Wunschel, Wolfgang Voss, Marc Keberle
    RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.2022; 194(03): 310.     CrossRef
  • Erdheim–Chester Disease with Isolated CNS Involvement: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Anam Haque, Carlos A. Pérez, Thejasvi A. Reddy, Rajesh K. Gupta
    Neurology International.2022; 14(3): 716.     CrossRef
  • Erdheim‐Chester disease with long‐standing diabetes insipidus and generalized edema
    Faezeh Sadat Naji, Minoo Sadat Hajmiri, Zahra Mazari, Faeze Salahshour, Vahid Soleimani, Manouchehr Nakhjavani, Mahboobeh Hemmatabadi
    Clinical Case Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Morbus Erdheim-Chester
    J. Knitza, E. Kampylafka, J. Wacker, G. Schett, B. Manger
    Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie.2019; 78(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • New causes of hypophysitis
    Kevin C.J. Yuen, Vera Popovic, Peter J. Trainer
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2019; 33(2): 101276.     CrossRef
  • Primary Necrobiotic Xanthogranulomatous Sialadenitis with Submandibular Gland Localization without Skin Involvement
    Myunghee Kang, Na Rae Kim, Dong Hae Chung, Jae Yeon Seok, Dong Young Kim
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2019; 53(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • Interferon-α

    Reactions Weekly.2018; 1709(1): 128.     CrossRef

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine